Malaysian judiciary has lost its credibility ?

Malaysian judiciary has lost its credibility and not it remains as Kangaroo Courts with Judges prostituting themselves to UMNO regime

Credible judiciary now a myth in M'sia Malaysian judiciary has lost its credibility and not it remains as Kangaroo Courts with Judges prostituting themselves to UMNO regime

'Saiful is definitely a very impressive illusionist. He can make consumed curry puffs disappear without a trace in his own bowel system.'

'Saiful a credible, truthful witness'

Rayfire: 'Credible' is now defined as being able to create 'incredible' lies in favour of one's masters. 'Truthful' is defined as being truthful to the cause of one's masters to remain in power whatever the circumstances.

'Judgment' here is defined as being a judge with the consent of one's masters and never pause for a moment to think for oneself. A credible judiciary system is now a myth as far as Malaysia is concerned.

Multi Racial: Justice Mohamad Zabidin Mohd Diah said Saiful Bukhari Azlan "is credible and truthful". That statement itself put doubt into Zabidin's credibility and truthfulness.

Ketuanan Rakyat: What can we expect from an Umnoputra-controlled court? In fact, almost all Malaysians expected this decision from this judge, who thinks Saiful is credible. Can anyone go without going to the toilet or washing his dirty backside for days? This shows how dirty Umnoputras can go to in order to bring down Anwar Ibrahim.

Changeagent: I'm not sure if I would go as far to consider him a credible and truthful witness, but Saiful is definitely a very impressive illusionist. He can make consumed curry puffs and coffee disappear without a trace in his own bowel system.

In addition to that, he can also make half a football team's DNA appear in his anus from just one alleged person's semen. Try beating that, David Copperfield.

Azizi Khan: Saiful a credible witness? The man who didn't wash his arse for days? Good going, judge.

Alan Goh: A day of mourning for rational Malaysians who still believe our justice system will issue fair judgments. If Saiful is a credible witness, so are the Datuk T trio, especially Shazryl Eskay Abdullah - the guy who lost the RM20 million crooked bridge suit and who later swore on the Quran in the mosque.

Since Anwar is asked to enter into his defence, the sex tape issue can temporarily be put on hold. One way or the other, Anwar will still have to go to jail for the second time until he is no longer a threat to Umno/BN.

Samuel Ng: Only those who are credible can ascertain another person's credibility to the satisfaction of others. I don't feel any satisfaction today.

Kgen: A person who claims he didn't pass motion for two days just to "preserve evidence" and can't decide whether he gave his ass forcibly or consensually is a truthful and credible witness? In that case, I have some valuable swampland to sell you.

AnonymousA: I have boycotted the Star since years ago, and now my Malaysiakini's subscription is expiring soon. Every morning when I switched on the PC, reading all the injustices and all the nuisance about the country, my blood boils.

I may not want to renew Malaysiakini anymore. I have given up on this land. 1SexMalaysiaBoleh. Umno/BN, you win.

Anonymous: Prior to Burma's 1990 general election, Aung San Suu Kyi was put under house arrest and not allowed to contest as a candidate. Still, her party NLD won more than 80 percent of the seats. There is no reason why Malaysians can't do that. They can take away Anwar, but they can't take away Malaysians' aspirations for a better government.

Tan Teng Wah: When the judge said Mohd Saiful is a "credible and truthful witness", he, in fact, has returned a verdict of 'guilty'. Undoubtedly, Anwar will be fighting a losing battle in the kangaroo court.

Judge orders Anwar to enter defence

Pemerhati: Two quotes by judge Zabidin: First, "The incident did take place and it indeed was consensual." Second, "Justice Zabidin mentions Saiful's rectum being empty - the witness said he wanted to preserve evidence and he had not defecate for two days."

From these two quotes it is clear that Zabidin knows that Saiful lied when he claimed that he was forcefully sodomised and when he claimed that he had not been to the toilet for two days. Yet he calls him a credible witness.

When you have a judge who comes to conclusions that defy simple logic and common sense and is able to conclude the very opposite of what the evidence clearly indicates, shows that the judge is either highly incompetent or has sold his soul to the devil and will do whatever the devil tells him.

Poppyie: It was testified that Saiful's rectum was empty and a lengthy swab of 9 cm from the anus was used to extract Anwar's semen, which already nestled in the bowel area.

Saiful also testified that he did not defecate for two days for reason that he wanted to preserve the priceless semen. Though Saiful had not defecated for two days, the bowel movement would have had pushed the waste to the entrance of his anus, and there was no way the rectum could be empty as testified.

Unless someone sucked out Saiful's waste there was no way for the rectum to be empty and consequently allowing for a high swap to extract the semen already nestled in the bowel area as claimed.

Md Imraz Muhammed Ikhbal: Granted that the judge finds Saiful a credible, truthful and reliable witness but of certainty, the right thinking citizens of world undoubtedly find this pathetic excuse for judge totally incredible and deplorably deceptive but nevertheless admirably reliable when it comes to being a pawn of the ruling elites in advancing their gutter political agenda.

When judicial rulings no longer adhere to the precepts of logic and the interpretation of law no longer upholds the tenets of justice and morality, then that marks the demise of lawfulness of a state.

It shall be in disdain in time to come when we lament the pits of humiliation our justice system has descended into under the rule of a corrupt regime.

M'sia1st: Today is not a verdict of guilty or not. Today's decision is whether there is prima facie, that's all. Ada faham?

Pants on Fire: But calling for the defence is as good as a conviction. The onus will then shift to the accused to prove that he is not guilty. To me, one is assumed guilty the moment defence is called. Whatever happens is God's will, and done for a purpose.

Ferdtan: Here is another Augustine Paul in making. Judge Augustine's untimely death gives a sense of poetic justice for his sins on earth. The prayer calling for divine intervention is more than relevant. The verdict will be as expected: guilty as charged.

Another long trial awaits Anwar to keep him busy from the coming general election. The real trial will be by the rakyat's court: Umno government is guilty as charged. Saiful is a shameless tool of a fiend. Judge Zabidin may go the same sorry way.

Chrispy: Sepandai-pandai tupai melompat akhirnya jatuh ke tanah jua. Jubah ugama yang di pakai untuk menyelubung kejahatan telah mula robak-rabek.

KSS: If anyone bothered watching Fareed Zakaria's GPS on CNN yesterday, we would have realised how far away we are behind our tiny neighbour, Singapore, which is No 1 on the Global Transparency/Corruption Index - meaning they are the least corrupt nation in the world.

We are probably aiming for world-class status as being the pariah of the world - thanks to Umno and BN.

EugeneT: This whole sandiwara and the prosecutors' charge reeks of inconsistency and doubts, and yet the judge claims Saiful is reliable and truthful? What are these imaginary dots the judge sees that we don't?

http://malaysianindian1.blogspot.com/