MUSA AMAN MAY LIKELY BE CHARGED |
By : ROCKY BRU
HERE'S the thing you'd notice right away: the
Hong Kong ICAC did not say if the Sabah Chief Minister may or may not
be charged, it is Rafizi Ramli the PKR dude claiming that the ICAC had
told him so. There's a big difference there.
"James To
memaklumkan kepada delegasi (KeADILan) bahawa ada kemungkinan besar
Dato' Seri Musa Aman boleh didakwa atas tuduhan pengubahan wang haram
(money laundering) yang undang-undangnya lebih ketat di Hong Kong
berbanding di negara-negara lain."
James
To is a member of Hong Kong's Bar Council and the naib pengerusi panel
keselamatan dan Undang-undang Majlis Perundangan yang bertanggungjawab
menyelia ICAC.
The
Hong Kong ICAC did not issue any official statement. James To did not
issue any official statement. But Rafizi said James said all that was
reported in Harakah in the PAS organ's Monday edition.
I
can't imagine the ICAC telling a complainant from Malaysia (who happens
to be a member of the Malaysian Opposition party) that the Commission
may most likely charge a Malaysian Chief Minister who is the subject of
the complaint (and who happens to be the complainant's major enemy) on
the strength of the complainant's "bukti-bukti dan dokument".
Sounds a
little too convenient but that's what Rafizi wants Harakah readers to
believe ...
I think he underestimates the Harakah readers' intelligence.
I especially like this part:
"...
ICAC memohon kerjasama kami untuk tidak membuat kenyataan lanjut
mengenai kes ini mengikut prosedur mereka bagi melindungi kerahsiaan
siasatan ...
Oleh itu, walaupun ICAC tidak akan mengesahkan secara rasmi
bahawa kes ini tidak dibuka semula, kesiriusan dan perhatian yang
diberikan mengenai kerahsiaan kes membayangkan bahawa siasatan penuh
akan menyusul."
Jeng, jeng, jeng.
Sabahkini
|
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.